Forums Search/Statistics
Track Forum09/02 09:11
Bridge Forum08/02 12:49
Works Forum08/02 14:08
General Forum08/02 15:51
 How to use RSS
 
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic View next topic
Author Message

G.V. RAMANA REDDY
DyCE/Works/CN/BNC

View user's profile
Shared Documents

Joined:
No. of
Replies: 16

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:58 am Back to top

In a recent case , the high court upheld the decision of the arbitrary tribunal and dismmissed the railways petition of arbitration tribunals award of a claim to refund the vitiation amonut ( Rs 30 lakhs) - now on onwards VITAMT - recevoered in a contract of value Rs 1.90 cr . Of course as it is normal in many contract cases there were several defaults by railway like change of drawing layout, not giving revised drawings in time , etc) .

However as contract envisaged a clear cut vitiation clause ( that in the venet of vitiation , payment at lowest of 1st,2nd,3rd lowest eligleble tenderred will be made) , the court order directing release of VITAMT tantamounts to that clauses of GCC, contract conditions etc which become EXCEPTED MATTERS can be challeged as these are against principles of natural justice .

Viatiation occurs only due to revision of quantities - and in majority of the cases it is due to railways poor planning before tendering . A tenderer quotes rates for several items of contract considering his potential of resources at his command to put effectively & economically to nations advantage and should normally be unconcerned about the rates what other bidders quote . When vitiiation is resulting due to one paties failure to abide by the schedule of quantiites - holding other party resposnsible annd penalising for no fault of that party is against priniclpels of natural justuice .

in the light of above , it is opined that the directives of railway Board (RB) on vitatiation need revision .

Hansraj Sharma
Sr System Manager

View user's profile
Shared Documents

Joined:
No. of
Replies: 354

PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:00 pm Back to top

Are there any instructions on VITIATION ?

SHIV KUMAR
GM(Con)

View user's profile
Shared Documents

Joined:
No. of
Replies: 323

PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:58 pm Back to top

Yes,there is a reference to the term "vitiation " in Para 1268 of Engg. Code which may be referred to for its proper appreciation and application.

V. Natarajan
AEN(TM)CCG

View user's profile
Shared Documents

Joined: May 02, 2005
No. of
Replies: 1236

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 9:42 am Back to top

One cannot definately recover the vitiation amount from the contractor and putting such tender conditions is illlogical.

THe amount of vitiation has to be treated as a single tender and dealt accordingly.
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic View next topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum